The benefit is that virtualizers tend to run a lot faster, but the drawback is that they can't be ported to a different architecture like an emulator can.Īpparently, SheepShaver is a bit of a hybrid in the fact that it virtualizes when running on a PowerPC and emulates when running on other architectures. In contrast, a virtualizer is designed to run only on the same type of processor with a compatible language, because virtualizers run as much code as possible directly on the CPU, without much if any translation. Emulators are capable of running on any processor/platform that the emulator's source code is compiled on and it's the job of the emulator to translate every single instruction of the emulated guest CPU language to that of the host's architecture. I think you might be a little confused on the difference between a virualizer like VirtualBox and an emulator like SheepShaver. Thanks for your answers ! Crocodil Posts: 3 Joined: 18. If it is possible, i'm sure that a lot of people would be so happy ! Here is an explanation on how to install it on mac os x for example:īut this last one is more complicate to install then VB, and it seems to be forget by its developpers. If you're planning to run SheepShaver on a PowerMac, you probably already have these two items. However, you still need a copy of MacOS and a PowerMac ROM image to use SheepShaver. SheepShaver is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL). There is also a built-in PowerPC emulator for non-PowerPC systems. If you are using a PowerPC-based system, applications will run at native speed (i.e. This means that both BeOS/Linux and MacOS applications can run at the same time (usually in a window on the BeOS/Linux desktop) and data can be exchanged between them.

SheepShaver is a MacOS run-time environment for BeOS and Linux that allows you to run classic MacOS applications inside the BeOS/Linux multitasking environment.

Virtualbox for mac os 9